首页> 外文OA文献 >Self-reported psychopathic traits among non-referred Finnish adolescents: psychometric properties of the Youth Psychopathic traits Inventory and the Antisocial Process Screening Device
【2h】

Self-reported psychopathic traits among non-referred Finnish adolescents: psychometric properties of the Youth Psychopathic traits Inventory and the Antisocial Process Screening Device

机译:在未提及的芬兰青少年中自我报告的精神病性状:青年精神病性状量表和反社会过程筛选设备的心理测量学性质

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundIn general psychiatric services, cost-benefit screening instruments for psychopathic traits in adolescents are needed. The aim of the present study was to study the psychometric properties of the Finnish versions of the Youth Psychopathic traits Inventory (YPI) and the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD-SR) in community youth. As gender-specific differences exist in psychopathic traits, we analyzed the data separately in girls and boys.MethodsThe YPI and the APSD-SR were administered to 372 9th graders (174 boys and 198 girls) with a mean age of 15.06 years (SD 0.28). Cronbach’s alphas were used to study internal consistency. The factor structures of the self-assessments were studied using both Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA).ResultsIn both self-assessments, boys scored significantly higher in the total scores, Interpersonal and Affective dimension scores as well as in most sub-dimensions. In the YPI, the alpha values for total and dimensional scores ranged from 0.55 to 0.91 in boys and from 0.74 to 0.89 in girls and, in the APSD-SR, respectively, from 0.38 to 0.78 and from 0.29 to 0.78. In CFA, the three-factor model produced poor fit for both self-assessments. For the ten sub-dimensions of the YPI, the PCA suggested two factors. Extending the model into three components showed sub-dimension loadings according to the original dimensions. For the APSD-SR, the PCA revealed a five-factor structure in the male sample and a six-factor one in the female group. When limiting the model to a three factor- model, we obtained a structure, which resembled the original dimensions.ConclusionsBoth the YPI and the APSD-SR are promising tools of screening for psychopathic features in Finnish community youth. The YPI turned out to be slightly better than the APSD- SR in both reliability and factor structure. However, the original three-factor models did not find support. Both self-assessments were somewhat weak for tapping the callous-unemotional traits of the psychopathic character, but, again, the YPI worked better than the ASPD-SR. Both self-assessments revealed significant gender differences in psychopathic character traits.
机译:背景技术在一般精神科服务中,需要针对青少年精神病性状的成本效益筛查工具。本研究的目的是研究社区青年中芬兰版本的青年精神病性状量表(YPI)和反社会过程筛选装置(APSD-SR)的心理测量特性。由于精神病性状存在性别差异,因此我们分别对男孩和女孩进行了数据分析。方法对372名9年级学生(174名男孩和198名女孩)进行YPI和APSD-SR,平均年龄为15.06岁(SD 0.28) )。克伦巴赫(Cronbach)的Alpha用于研究内部一致性。结果使用自评因子分析(CFA)和主成分分析(PCA)研究了自我评估的因素结构。结果在两项自我评估中,男孩的总分,人际关系和情感维度得分以及大多数子维度。在YPI中,男孩的总分和维度得分的alpha值范围从0.55至0.91,女孩的alpha值范围从0.74至0.89,而APSD-SR中的alpha值分别从0.38至0.78和0.29至0.78。在CFA中,三因素模型对两种自我评估的适应性都很差。对于YPI的十个子维度,PCA提出了两个因素。根据原始尺寸,将模型扩展为三个部分会显示次尺寸载荷。对于APSD-SR,PCA在男性样本中显示出五因素结构,在女性样本中显示出六因素结构。将模型限制为三因素模型时,我们获得了一个类似于原始尺寸的结构。结论YPI和APSD-SR都是筛选芬兰社区青年精神病特征的有前途的工具。事实证明,YPI在可靠性和因子结构上都比APSD-SR稍好。但是,原始的三因素模型没有找到支持。两种自我评估在利用精神病患者的性格不调和的性格方面都较弱,但是,同样,YPI比ASPD-SR更好。两项自我评估均显示出精神病性状特征上存在明显的性别差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号